Our Research Methodology
How we select topics, gather evidence, and produce our reports.
Process Overview
- Topic Selection: We identify research gaps based on recurring questions from institutional buyers and market intelligence.
- Evidence Collection: Analysts gather published data, vendor documentation, user reviews, and industry submissions.
- Evaluation: Evidence is assessed against our pre-published criteria. Each source is rated for reliability.
- Review: Draft reports undergo peer review by at least one named external reviewer.
- Publication: Reports are published with full disclosure of limitations and evidence quality ratings.
- Correction: When new evidence emerges, we update reports and document all changes publicly.
Evidence Quality Framework
We rate evidence across four tiers:
- Tier A — Primary Data: Direct quantitative results, audit outcomes, verified case studies.
- Tier B — Expert Testimony: Statements from recognised authorities, peer-reviewed academic work.
- Tier C — Secondary Sources: Industry analyses, analyst firm reports, trade publications.
- Tier D — Vendor-Provided: Marketing materials, white papers, product documentation (rated as lowest weight).